a few notes :
- high ping gives high Delay but that doesn't change much about reaching or not your opponent short accelerations ; what it changes is that if you're late on them, more often you won't have time to strike normally & you'll do the safe shot ( = no button shot)
- movement of your opponent is getting strange with high Delay coz it's a prediction that can go wrong
- I always play with 200ms Delay (if not 250) and I don't have issue, for me it feels same than offline play against the CPU (except for the occasional forced Safe shots when I'm very late on the ball)
Nadalesque wrote:Greetings Mr Manu ,
We were playing at a delay of 200ms , ping ranging from 230-250(not more) and the lag ratio we played in was 0%.
I don't understand what Dasp is trying to prove by complaining.
We also played the Acapulco final as a reserve wherein I beat him 60 61 and he gave his opponent (adner i believe) a WO. I could have got him banned , but I didn't post the reserve on the official topic and thus didn't insist on getting him banned.
Now no one else seems to have a problem playing with me ,and I don't know why he's saying he can't play at 230 ping. I don't think the result would have been any different had we played at 150 ping either , cause that would have made it even easier for me.
Thanks and Regards,
Jai aka Nadalesque
adner wrote:These glitches make game really ridiculous. If you watch your opponent position during rallies and the animations, with this "glitch algorithm" you end up confused and your opponent is suddenly everywhere else but where he's supposed to be. I already sent you a recorded match about it and I guess now I know what's the source of my problems. If it doesn't work as intended, why is it even in use at first place? Unless it's intended that lagging opponents get advantage by teleporting around the court.
And when I ask moderators for lag rule, I hear "I am against the conception of lag rule"
Nadalesque wrote:Well , your getting personal now , but i can conclude that you are so not sportive . And i have played fellow Indians at 50 ping too , and my movement only gets better , the lesser the ping. And all top players have Bad connection right ?
How many top players are from India ? or other countries with bad ping ?
Dasp wrote:So Nadalesque def me 6/1 6/4, and first of all congrats on the title im sure it wont be the last
Now the point of this is very simple, and i created this not just because of this last match cuz this feeling inside of me has already been growing for months, and i have even talked with some guys about it.. Said that i just have one question to ask- Who here feels, that in this last months has been unfairly defeat by someone just because there connection has high ping? (my connection isnt great but it allows me to play with almost everyone with a ping below 170/180)
Now if u notice the guys becoming the top players are the ones with the worst connection, and i have discussed this with several people and they agree..i mean before to be the best u needed the best movement and to have a varied game, using spins, slices, angles, net and accelarations.. Now what i see is in some players just hit accelarations, and then an angle cross court which is impossible to reach with high ping, other just net, and others just net and spin.. Plus returning a winner is impossible cuz the outcome will problably will be and error..
So i wonder WTF happen? i mean yesterday i beat Crete which is the best all rounded player at the time and today i can´t even take a set at Nadalesque that cant barely move?( im sorry dude but ur movement isnt that great, but this applys to almost every player with high ping who are in one side of the court and then appear on the other side hiting a winner)
Concluding i just remain with the thought, whats the difference of us winning with LR and losing against some (used by months or years of practice) to such a connection?
I think i said what many are thinking but didnt had the courage to say
Anyway congrats once again Nadalesquece and GL..
Nadalesque wrote:You beat crete 7-5 6-3 right ?
We played on Sat and we played 2 sets both of which I won 6-2 6-2 . So what do u say about that?
Dasp wrote:Im not sure if i did or dint give him a wo however here is the prof that i accepted to play but since i wasnt online those days i would problably give a free pass to adner
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 0 guests