So, I attached a set with Mr.Schmith on clay where I lost 1-6 and it could have been 0-6 even. He used a defender profile similar to the one he used at RG 2010 (he uses counter these days on tour). Anyways, the difference is so huge that I needed to make this topic Firstly, I played some cool sets with him over the last month when he used puncher and counter and I felt that I can compete even if I had lost most of the sets - it felt like it was fair.
Now, you can have a look at the .dmo, anyways...the top spin depth and even the return is just so overpowered that I have no words for it...I knew that I don't have a chance to win from point 1 ...It was actually 2-6 1-6 but I only attach the 2nd set here......It's just so funny that he is the "defender" and I end up having to defend all the time, while when he uses different profiles I can compete at least. That's kinda telling me something is still wrong with the defender profile and these deep spins...it's just a severe imbalance
Furthermore, notice how he can reset the point a lot easier with the fh, even though bh is far from being a problem either...I tried spamming his bh in some points but after a while I realised it was hopeless and just wanted to finish with a game if possible
Anyways, let me know what you think.
P.S. I dont have the .dmos of the other stuff but one set puncher vs puncher I won 7-6, with counter he mostly won 2-6 or 3-6 but I had some 7-6 sets also, the difference is that it feels like you have got a chance but once he used the defender profile there was really 0 chance to win, especially since he improved his movement since last year when I could actually win more games vs his defender profile on clay.