manutoo wrote:- Stats : forced errors on the run are now counted as winners for the opponent
That's a bit strange.

manutoo wrote:- Stats : forced errors on the run are now counted as winners for the opponent
manutoo wrote:Changes :
- Stats : forced errors on the run are now counted as winners for the opponent
manutoo wrote:Stats keep track of how points ended. There are only 2 ways to end the point : a winner, or an error. An error can be unforced or forced. You didn't want to see this kind of errors kept in the "Error" stats, then it falls in the "Winners", just 2 choices, there's not such thing as it's not an error nor a winner...
By extension, if a player hits a strike that let no chance to his opponent to put back in play, then it's a winner, even if his opponents touches the ball. Depending of the statistician and its methodology, it'll fall either in the winner or the fault category in a TV match.
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=2606858&postcount=6 wrote:Actually the definition of 'winner' isn't really that clear-cut, contrary to popular belief. I've been counting only 'clean' winners in many matches & seeing that they rarely match up with the official stats.
krosero asked Leo Levin, who is a statistician for many of the networks, if any touched balls are counted as winners. His response:
Quote:
balls that are barely touched by the opponent are usually counted as
winners - if the opponent directs the ball back toward the net and the ball
reaches the net on the fly, the stroke is counted as a forced error not a
winner. Balls that are tipped - directed towards the side fences or stands
- are considered to be winners.
The goal of this was to appropriately award the resulting shot - i.e. was
the player able to make any kind of reasonable attempt to put the ball back
in play - if not, the result was a winning shot from the opponent.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest