Francesco Dimitrov wrote:Henrich sorry but i dont understand the rules of these "tournament" : algo give me the lost for R.L. when me and my opponent will organized to play today at 21 cet....can u explain about that?
Francesco Dimitrov wrote:Ahhhhh ok...now i read the rules and the R.L. mean Random Luck.....so its like heads or tails before start the match;but in this case the lucky will decided the match...right?! Very nice,congratulation for the admin to applied this rules,never seen somethink similar in ITST(never exist).![]()
I thinks that this rules its "ridiculous" anyway congratulation of my opponent to " win " this match,very great opponent.
I have no words.... very ridiculous forum.
Francesco Dimitrov wrote:Henrich sorry but i dont understand the rules of these "tournament" : algo give me the lost for R.L. when me and my opponent will organized to play today at 21 cet....can u explain about that?
Francesco Dimitrov wrote:Thanks for that Mark Chan, i appreciate that....unnfortunally i dindt use skype...in ITST its sufficient a pm and i had done these for many years but i can understand this rules of these forum and ok probably my trouble but if my opponent tell me that "its ok...we can play Tomorrow" and this morning im wake up and i see "R.L." i think that is a very frustration because i cant accept to lost to my opponent but not like that; and i had see that these happen many times......even quarter of final and semifinal to win like that....and for what??????Random Luck???So in final of Wimbledon there is a top 1 versus top 10 and the top 1 press "R.L. botton" and he will win the tournament like that???? Its a joke???!.![]()
For me "i repat" dont never exist but the way if there is a rules of forum no problem....i never sign up for these tournament in a future because i willnever accept this.
See u and good luck for all and thanks for the answer.
Francesco Dimitrov wrote:in ITST its sufficient a pm and i had done these for many years
MarkChan wrote:I dunno how ITST decides on matches that are not played.
ShoNe wrote:Like our DISQ... But on ITST, if both players don't have desire to play, hosts (like our mods) decide match by "No match" and next opponent gets Walkover. But on this forum, if one of player doesn't have desire, he can still win by RL. I think ITST rule about that is better.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests