Algo wrote:It should be changed to no LR at all, but whatever...
Stajus wrote:Now I'm hearing that a lot of the top players play with 200 delay...is this some kind of joke?
I know for a fact that the delay difference of 200-117 affects the consistency and depth of my return of serve and I get aced more as well...Playing at 200-250 is unfair to people who don't have high pings with most players. So now this is a laggers' Tour? You're actually at a disadvantage if you're from Europe/USA and/or have a good connection.
184 is the highest delay that should be used...and anyone who has a ping over 368 ms with people shouldn't even be playing the Tour.
Dasp wrote:As much as i agree with u mate, there is no point in arguing, i tried and everything stayed the same..
Nice to see you back
Stajus wrote:I know for a fact that the delay difference of 200-117 affects the consistency and depth of my return of serve and I get aced more as well...
manutoo wrote:Delay doesn't affect the "consistency and depth of [your] return of serve" ; it either makes you do a safe strike, or doesn't have any influence, and it doesn't favor aces either.
SPC wrote:I have to somehow agree with you, even at 200 delay tops that safe strike is avoidable, but anything bigger than that number ruins the gameplay. It becomes a serving-winner lottery, not fun at all.
With bigger delays i see more aces as well, it feels like the ball travels faster than in lower delays...
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot] and 0 guests