Mana Games

[Marcos Nion]

Hope not... Our tour, our rules, it should be like that...

[Algo]

Marcos:
You may say there are 2 kind of rules, general and special rules.
Special rules are listed here and apply only to this specific SAT tournaments. (e.g LR can only be asked by SA players in a SAT tournament)
General rules are everything that's not listed here, and apply to both SAT or regular tournaments. (e.g matches are played in fair mode, tiredness off, sim controls, or serving from the corners is not allowed)

[Marcos Nion]

Marcos:
You may say there are 2 kind of rules, general and special rules.
Special rules are listed here and apply only to this specific SAT tournaments. (e.g LR can only be asked by SA players in a SAT tournament)
General rules are everything that's not listed here, and apply to both SAT or regular tournaments. (e.g matches are played in fair mode, tiredness off, sim controls, or serving from the corners is not allowed)

Yes, general rules are perfect ... What I mean is exactly about the special rules, if it's a SA Tour, South Americans should have 100% of advantage on it (e.g Even if a SA do not appear to play his match, he should get the WO though or have more chances on the RL...) ... Actually, it wasn't the South Americans that were complaining about Lag or Time Zone.. it was the Europeans... ... It's like Stan says: U MAD ... (I laughed with this one, congrats Stanko...)

[Algo]

re-read that rule, it doesn't mean you may not be here but would get a w.o anyway. It's saying that if a non-SA player is not here at those times, given the fact that the SA player was, the SA player would get a w.o instead of having the match decided by RL.
There are 3 hypothesis that should concur simultaneously for this rule's effects to happen.
- There should be a SA player playing against a non SA player.
- The non SA player shouldn't have been online at the times we've stablished
- The SA player should have.

[Marcos Nion]

re-read that rule, it doesn't mean you may not be here but would get a w.o anyway. It's saying that if a non-SA player is not here at those times, given the fact that the SA player was, the SA player would get a w.o instead of having the match decided by RL.
There are 3 hypothesis that should concur simultaneously for this rule's effects to happen.
- There should be a SA player playing against a non SA player.
- The non SA player shouldn't have been online at the times we've stablished
- The SA player should have.

Ok friend... Go on with it ... Cyu later...

[adner]

Any nationalistic remarks are highly not welcome here. One of the reasons this tour was created was to avoid those. I deleted any flame-war inciting posts(and their quotations).

[Marcos Nion]

Any nationalistic remarks are highly not welcome here. One of the reasons this tour was created was to avoid those. I deleted any flame-war inciting posts(and their quotations).

Good of you... highing the truth... CONGRATS...