Tennischampion wrote:well i already did post it before but on wrong forum i believe.so i now just link that topic over here.hopefully some guys support this.pls don't comment badly and make it non sense .if u dont like this method then just say "no" and mention ur reason.
here is the link: topic23-2441.php
support the topic by giving ur valuable votes(just a hope that manutoo and tour modes think on this topic)
i also believe that if RL is done, it shud be shown some proof rather than believing whatever mods say well i m not talking about mods but i dont understand why only seeds(almost 95%) win RL.so i think a proof is to be shown
...the poll is for only laggy matches...
amelie mauresmo wrote:Its good between 250-400ms couse in bigger ping, tiebreaks are unplayable like the normal match so then rl have to come ( in an other method) like yuki told: "only seeds(almost 95%) win RL" so something have to be change in it too. Less adventage.ex:60%-40%. Not 90%-10%
Tennischampion wrote:yeah i agree with both of u guys .if RL is done ther shud be some proof if not they need to follow best of three tiebreaks method(becos it saves lot of time and result is much fair than doing RL)
amelie mauresmo wrote:Its good between 250-400ms couse in bigger ping, tiebreaks are unplayable like the normal match so then rl have to come ( in an other method) like yuki told: "only seeds(almost 95%) win RL" so something have to be change in it too. Less adventage.ex:60%-40%. Not 90%-10%
Tennischampion wrote:Well mods,u shud think a bit why many people dislike RL.and here is another link which shows RL is a joke.i think stajus is right
topic23-2518.php
Mods RL shud be removed and best of tiebreaks or any other alternative shud be introduced.i hope u guys soon respond to this and change the ruleRL.becos RL is just unfair in all respects
Tennischampion wrote:yeah sure....but there shud be some proof to show what mods are saying is right or wrong.I mean RL with proof to show that u/ur opponent have won the particular match...and u know mods just say in msn the result but there is no identical proof.they may be lying also...thats what i m concerned about
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests