Mana Games

[Tennischampion]

Random luck(lol this doesnt give big luck to unseeded guys anyway ),it is just bad thing that any player wants to have but due to lag its done.i think i have an idea(may be or may not be good )which cud work in the favour of better(or luckier) player and here it is
i think if the lag is high that both players cannot play(may be even if they play it takes more than 2hrs to finish 2sets lol )
1)then taking less time best of 3 tie-breaks shud be conducted rather than best of 3sets becos this may take less time to finish the match( a max.time around 30min most probably ) and i think this wud give good result to player who is better than his opponent becos it will be just a very pressure match and good one will win for sure and..
2) i think advantage of this cud be less time for completion of laggy match and no RL and ofcourse the deserved player wud win the match
3)normally before going to RL,the players normally play two games to see whether lag decreases or not and then we apply for RL but taking almost same time(ofcourse 10-15min more )we get the total result by playing best of 3 tiebreaks and also if luck is ther then the luckier player wins (so its just god decision to give luck and will definitely be better than RL done by mods which always favour seeds )

[MaxPoint]

It's a good idea when the lag is very high play the best 3 tie break, would be faster and smoothly and the player with demo would be better by the time limit.

[yuki]

tog i think this idea works better and its good as alternative to rl becos here time limit decreases hugely and we get a fair result i mean u can choose this idea for next season as a mod.many like this in our game.i played with many players and they liked this idea.so u can have an eye on it probably by next season

[Santiago92]

Yes... and if somebody denies to play best of 3/5 tie-breaks, he/she will lose

[K Z]

Yes... and if somebody denies to play best of 3/5 tie-breaks, he/she will lose

best of three tie breaks is unacceptable , because if the lag is bad , players can't give their best and it can be a handicap for some players , which is unfair !!!
so if there is an unplayable lag , then RL will be done !

[Algo]

best of three tie breaks is unacceptable , because if the lag is bad , players can't give their best and it can be a handicap for some players , which is unfair !!!
so if there is an unplayable lag , then RL will be done !

but, if both players agree to play the match in 3/5 tie breaks, what can be done in that case?, you (talking about all the mods, in general ) can't force a RL if the match was already played or is about to be played in tie breaks,...also, if my opponent doesn't want to play in that way and the match is too laggy to play normally(310ms or more I think it would be bad enough not to play, or this lag that is 1 sec at 200, for example but the next one is 900) I can't force my opponent to play and, in that case, as the last resource the RL should be done

[Santiago92]

best of three tie breaks is unacceptable , because if the lag is bad , players can't give their best and it can be a handicap for some players , which is unfair !!!
so if there is an unplayable lag , then RL will be done !

Yes, in horrible conditions... but not in good conditions... I mean, I always have 300+ ms with european players and some of them don't want to play cause they use to play with 150 ms...

I'm very very upset with weeka32 since US Open, cause ping was 490 ms, but it wasn't too laggy (unplayable)... and RL was done though I did wanted to play.

[Tennischampion]

yeah KZ what u said is right but when both players agree then why cant they play it and thats more fair than RL and mods have allow this thing into tournaments becos luck is just bullshit for many players against seeds .i mean they always lose against seeds if RL is done.lol i know many players who play better than seeds but they lose matches due to RL which is plain stupid.so if both agree and if conditions are around 300 ping then mods shud allow them to play the tie breaks which saves lot of horrible time and gets a result that is most perfect than RL.well atleast by next year i want to see this hopefully becos people want an appreciated match than RLs.so being a mod pls think on it once(new players get lot of benefit and they can beat seeds if they r capable due to this and they appreciate this )i hope u give us a good reply on this

[Richou]

im pretty sure chiller got w.od out of basel last year, he was a seed

[Tennischampion]

[Tennischampion]

i think if RL is done, it shud be shown some proof.i mean only mods say a particular guy won(certainly seeds many times),so there is no proof to see whether they r telling truth or false.i think mods shud show proof after RL is done otherwise its just bullshit to do RL

[Tennischampion]

lol the no.of people supporting this method are increasing.it seems this idea is fair enough and much better than RL and some guys like this

[amelie mauresmo]

best of three tie breaks is unacceptable , because if the lag is bad , players can't give their best and it can be a handicap for some players , which is unfair !!!
so if there is an unplayable lag , then RL will be done !

In this way...there is hadicap in RL too which is unfair....so?????

[Tennischampion]

yeah that's right