I took a break for a longer time in playin this great game (around Version .50) and now got back. I have to say I rly like the direction and development since then. It feels way better now than TE2013 and way more realistic in the gameplay. But I noticed some things negative and positive:
negative:
1. Lobs are still far to powerful - it might be, that I am playing Junior tour, but even against Giants (explanation comes later) they work very very effctive without having great skill (pointwise) in it.
2. I get weird glitches sometimes, when a player is dribbeling the ball before the serve. The arm is somewhat unnaturally extended then - I would guess, this is a known graphic-bug.
3. Slices are sometimes crazy. I am not a good slice-player and use them pretty much never, except when I feel I have to. But the CPU does some crazy things with them, which are'nt feel right. You adressed this in your dev-blog I think, but I wanted to mention it.
4. Almost all oppenents I had so far in my new career are making to much unforced errors I think - but I dont know the real ratios and it might be related to my later question.
positive:
1. The game feels way more intuitive than TE2013 when to make what shots, be agressive/defensive etc.
2. The new Stadiums looking great!
3. Animations are mostly very good now and almost never feel off - it happens, but its not very noticable.
4. I tried the basic commentary system for like a set and never heard a commentary twice - despite being very basic at the moment, this makes me very excited of things to come in this regard

Now the question:
Got the game easier since I stopped? Because it feels a lot like it - let me elaborate:
My way of starting in a career and figure out my preferred difficulty-lvl is starting at pro 1 usually and going up to like pro 4 or 5 in a few matches. After 2 or 3 tournaments that gets maybe to 6. Now I had to raise it crazy fast - I won a grade D Tournament against opponents that are in my range pointswise - got to 6 and won with a wildcard 2rounds in a grad C Tournament against way better opponents pointswise. At the moment I am sitting at pro 8 and got to the last qualification round of Wimbledon. Played against good players, but it felt ok. Now I play against a 18 year old 197cm Giant, that is literally half a meter taller than me

Is pro 10 still considered the realistic standard like in TE2013 or has smth changed there? And last time I played I was at pro 4 or 5 I think and not in a million years able to win against such opponents.
So how exactly is the playerrating working - its clear, that the skillpoints are one thing, but other (hidden?) stats effect them or the composition of stats are in a manner, that a weaker player is better. I would like some clarification here, because in TE2013 it was basically the same, but not with such huge differences I think. But it might be the Juniorpart of it, that is the problem ...
So thanks in advance and as always - you are the best manu


