Mana Games

[Jazzo]

This guest is blackym, only he can't make quotes... and has very bad english. And all that in just one post.

[Williamz]

No Jazzo, it was me. But I don't have bad English.

I just warn you, with each post like that you are making yourself look even more dumb, so I suggest you stop right there and start being an honest player.

[Jazzo]

Sorry but I can't take seriously person who doesn't know how to register on this forum / writting all posts as guest.

And it's quite funny to see how far you are willing to go to defend your illegal victory. But ok, I understand, they don't come so often.

[Williamz]

Sorry but I can't take seriously person who doesn't know how to register on this forum / writting all posts as quest.

Yeah well I can't take seriously a person whose name is Jazzo. As absurd a claim as you are making. Weird.

All I can say is that I'm enjoying debating with you, since you are so easily made to look like an absolute oaf, and that is the only reason I bother to continue this.

My humble apologies to moderators.

[percy896]

Sorry but I can't take seriously person who doesn't know how to register on this forum / writting all posts as quest.

Yeah well I can't take seriously a person whose name is Jazzo. As absurd a claim as you are making. Weird.

All I can say is that I'm enjoying debating with you, since you are so easily made to look like an absolute oaf, and that is the only reason I bother to continue this.

My humble apologies to moderators.

I understand that arguments happen, just in the future debate in another post, not in Results.
And Jazzo, you especially; you're already on thin ice

[manutoo]

Jazzo,

usually, when a desynchronization occurs, both players win the point on their own PC, so it's similarly "unfair" to restart the point for both of them...

[Williamz]

S.Williamz(11) d. Jazzo(8) 6-3

[Guest]

sarcastic1 defeated charlie 6-4 4-6 6-4 not on the ladder but me thinks he, or she may have been playing under a different name, is that possible ?

[Williamz]

No sarcastic1, it wasn't me

I was trying to join you, but there is this bug, that if there are two available games, in spots 1 and 2, and when you're trying to join number 2 which was you sarcastic, it goes to the game number 1. Annoying.
I'm sorry.

[Guest]

no problem williamz, im sure ill get another game from you sometime, just wish i could beat you though you little minx youll have to be kind to me next time

[Exilians]

Today,

Silexian (18 ) beats Marat Safin (17) : 6-7 / 7-6 / 7-6

great game Marat Safin, great game. Willing to do a rematch these days !

[Blacky]

Jazzo,

usually, when a desynchronization occurs, both players win the point on their own PC, so it's similarly "unfair" to restart the point for both of them...

I don't agree That happens rearly, and only when desynchronization happens in the middle of the point. What about desynchroinaztion after the point?

There should be fair play, but I assume that to some players victory is more important than fair play

[Williamz]

First of all, desynch happens very rarely, and usually for only a few points, and it is nobodys fault that it happens...and it would be way too confusing to determinate which player really won the point and it would take too much time to argue, so the best thing to do is say that the point didn't start and then replay the point. I don't see anything unfair about it when the point is replayd. Saying someones victory is unfair because of few questionable points were replayed is completely absurd to me.

Plus, I completely disagree with Jazzo about the desycho points we had, I think I won them. So I think Jazzo should have allowed me to hit easy winners because I was the real winner of those points.

See, confusing. Best thing to do is to replay and get on with it.

[Blacky]

First of all, desynch happens very rarely, and usually for only a few points, and it is nobodys fault that it happens...and it would be way too confusing to determinate which player really won the point and it would take too much time to argue, so the best thing to do is say that the point didn't start and then replay the point. I don't see anything unfair about it when the point is replayd. Saying someones victory is unfair because of few questionable points were replayed is completely absurd to me.

Plus, I completely disagree with Jazzo about the desycho points we had, I think I won them. So I think Jazzo should have allowed me to hit easy winners because I was the real winner of those points.

See, confusing. Best thing to do is to replay and get on with it.

nope, if desync. happens after the point, then it's pretty obvious who won the point, and there should be no arguing cause there is not much to argue.
Several times I lost point in tiebreak and desync. happend, but I allowed may opponent to make an ace or a winner.
And Jazzo always do the same thing, i know that because I played at least 50 matches against him.

If desync. happens in the middle of the point, then the point should be replayed

[manutoo]

The desynchronization can only be detected when the point is won, on at least 1 of the 2 PCs, even if the desync actually occurred at the beginning of the point.
So if both PCs are in the middle of a point, desync just can't be detected...
That's why when a desync is detected, it's just better to replay the point. If you think you had to lose the point, you still can give it to your opponent, but you can't force your opponent to give you the point, as actually, you can't be sure of what happened on his side.