Mana Games

I dont know if the people agree with me but i think that we need in TE11 a hawkeye

what do you think people and manu ?

NO! For F*** sake the only use of hawkeye is to correct calls made by HUMANS

This game already makes the correct calls so please stop suggesting useless stuff..It dosent add to the gameplay one bit

PattySchnyder wrote:NO! For F*** sake the only use of hawkeye is to correct calls made by HUMANS

This game already makes the correct calls so please stop suggesting useless stuff..It dosent add to the gameplay one bit

hey! quiet! take it easy

Maybe yes, maybe not, becuz it's a pc game, but sometimes are useful

Escribo en castellano porque mi ingles es malo.

Quizas podria ser el ojo de halcon, en las pelotas dudosas podria ponerte la opcion de elejir el challenge para retar, si no lo aceptas y la pelota fue buena, tu pierdes. he jugado un juego que es así, no recuerdo el nombre ahora.

we already had this idea somewhere and its totally useless. Its a computer system who judges already that means if u need hawkeye to work then u need stupid line judges

Please stop making pointless endless topics

Dubious.

NO!! as there is a preview we can easily knw whether its in or out so its unncessary

still i feel there are lot of close calls where it seems umpire is wrong..specially on serve.......it can be a welcome addition to the game and bring a bit of realism too

Useless idea..

Another game (which I will not mention the name) tried that idea, but it's completly useless.. There's a lot of bugs.. When the ball is clearly in, the hawkeye says out.. or when it touch the line ( a little ) the hawkeye says out..

will there also be an option for calling foot faults?

Richou wrote:Please stop making pointless endless topics

.....................

Facepalm for this topic please.