Re: Questions about doubles
Rob, thank you for your suggestion. I am hoping I won't need it for THIS game, but if I have to start over (again), I will keep it in mind. Emily was accepted into Challenger qualifying, where her team was made the top seed. Sarah won France 1 doubles, but only advanced one placement to 403. I have hopes that France 2 will put her over the top, but if it doesn't, I will try your idea.
I believe this is some sort of statistical oddity that occurs from time to time. Certain combinations of players accumulate the same number of points over the same span of time, so there is very little movement in the rankings. This is the fifth or sixth time I have started TEM, and only the second time this has occured. My first time with 1.0d had nothing like this. I can't remember clearly, because it was back around the time 1.0c came out, but I think that time the problem was slow advancement through singles. I do not believe this is a problem with the program.
What might be a problem with the program is the accuracy of the advisories we receive when we apply to tournaments. Sarah's 404 would have placed her just one spot below the fourth seed in that qualifier, and the majority of the players in it were in the range 440-470, yet Sarah with her 404 was told she would likely be too low. It would seem unlikely (though certainly not impossible) that so many players would plunge that far down the rankings in four weeks.
I believe this is some sort of statistical oddity that occurs from time to time. Certain combinations of players accumulate the same number of points over the same span of time, so there is very little movement in the rankings. This is the fifth or sixth time I have started TEM, and only the second time this has occured. My first time with 1.0d had nothing like this. I can't remember clearly, because it was back around the time 1.0c came out, but I think that time the problem was slow advancement through singles. I do not believe this is a problem with the program.
What might be a problem with the program is the accuracy of the advisories we receive when we apply to tournaments. Sarah's 404 would have placed her just one spot below the fourth seed in that qualifier, and the majority of the players in it were in the range 440-470, yet Sarah with her 404 was told she would likely be too low. It would seem unlikely (though certainly not impossible) that so many players would plunge that far down the rankings in four weeks.