Page 1 of 1

Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Feb 2016, 04:03
by Naastooo
Hi,

The Rio de Janeiro Doubles draw has been released. You can find the draws here: OnlineTournaments.php <---- Thats where players are to post their match scores (eg. 6-1 6-2, not 1-6 2-6). Anyone may post here to confirm their match scores

Surface: Clay
Number of sets: Best of 3, 3rd set Master tibreak
Mode: Realistic (Elite). Tiredness On.

HowTo&Rules - topic13-4767.php.php for an explanation.

Points:
R16: 0
Quarterfinals: 90
Semifinals: 180
Final: 300
Winner: 500

Deadlines:
R16: Tuesday
Quarterfinals: Thursday
Semifinals: Saturday
Finals: Sunday

The winner will receive 500 points.
Good luck and have fun!
"You should globally act with fair play and not be rude to your opponent."

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 18 Feb 2016, 20:56
by NESXA
Reserves:

SF - ShoNe def. Marin - 6/1, 6/3 - GG & GL
F - ShoNe def. Quasar - 6/3, 6/2 - GG & GL

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 18 Feb 2016, 21:03
by Marin
Confirmed.Great performance by them both.I was trying to do something but i couldnt coz my partner was disaster.Gl in final and future.

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 19 Feb 2016, 15:37
by Quasar
Reserve: Quasar b. Kimiko Date Krumm 4/6 7/5 10-4

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 19:19
by Ivo ISNER
Def. Quasar 6-2 6-2


Everything was fine until i served for the set at 5-2 and the conditions were HORRIBLE, feel bad winning like this.

GG+GL to a fair player

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 19:24
by Quasar
no comment...things are not changed ':D

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 21:39
by Ivo ISNER
def. sale93 6-0 6-2

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 21:47
by Sale93
Semi-final: Ivo ISNER def. Sale93 6/0 6/2
very, very unfair player, spammer, lager, tennis player who will never be even close to the best ...these players should be punish bans - (if banned constant lob, then why not prohibit spamming?)
really bad player...I wish him a great failure and defeat in the finals :)
not-GL & not-GG ;)

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 21:55
by Ivo ISNER
Thx man I appreciate it, as for you, nice match stalling, spamming chat quotes, and going into menus every 2 minutes. BTW I'm not a lagger, im form us, you're from serbia, so the connection wont be great.

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 22:37
by NESXA
F - ShoNe def. Ivo ISNER - 6/1, 6/3 - Good match, but we had problems with lag sometimes.. I heard that Sale and Quasar also had problems with lag, but never mind. I hope next time it will be better.

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 22:48
by Sale93
Congrats ShoNe!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I haven't suspected in your quality against partially bad players ;)

@IVO ISNER
I have no problem when I play (for example) vs. LetsGoBro who is from Australia and I hadn't problems with you in first round of AO, one month ago... So, distance doesn't influence on this. You proved that you have bad ping because I prayed you for a hour to show me screenshot of your ping. You refused that. On the end, you probably found fake photo and sent to me where I couldn't see anything (date on desktop nor anything)... Anyway, if distance can influence, I think that MANUTOO should ask himself if he want to lose a lot of players who have good ping or a few players with bad ping.

Re: Rio de Janeiro Doubles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 20 Feb 2016, 23:05
by Ivo ISNER
Today was a bad day for my connection, but at least i have learned to take a loss with grace.

Shone,
Congrats for your fair play. You clearly showed us why you are number one.

Sale,
If i'm "partially bad", then why did i beat you 6-0 6-2. And why would i send a "fake photo" Im not a lier, thats a reason why im a mod. So stop with all of your accusatory garbage. Your claims were the most ridiculous claims i have ever heard.

This topic is locked.