Page 4 of 5

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 19:06
by Igor Josifoski
Dasp wrote:me and victoria azarenka are going for RL cuz the connection is awfull, he is from columbia but anyway GL :sweat:


Then take a LR cause this one is not from the SAT category. :)

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 19:17
by Phábio
Karim is not playing Qualifying Q3, he doesn't tell me when he can play, he just said when he COULDN'T play -.- I mean, I'm waiting for him on MSN and he doesn't show, what can I do?

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 19:18
by Mohamed
he is online lol, add me: mohamed.thab@live.fr

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 19:28
by adner
Igor Josifoski wrote:Then take a LR cause this one is not from the SAT category. :)


Right, make players with good attitude change it for worse :roll:

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 20:08
by Dasp
Igor Josifoski wrote:Then take a LR cause this one is not from the SAT category. :)

i can do that?
well i dont think thats necessary as long as he is fair enough and next time he give me a WO, if not then we'll see what happens :whistle:

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 21:40
by Stajus
Reserve QF: Stajus def. Jelena Jankovic 6-7 (5) 7-6 (9) 6-3 :cool:

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 14 Aug 2012, 22:14
by Igor Josifoski
adner wrote:
Right, make players with good attitude change it for worse :roll:


We should lose our matches because of someone that doesn't deserve to play on the tour? That's their fault that they live in South America, not mine or dasp's ;)

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 01:31
by Algo
Igor Josifoski wrote:
We should lose our matches because of someone that doesn't deserve to play on the tour? That's their fault that they live in South America, not mine or dasp's ;)

Maybe it's you who doesn't deserve to play... :wink:



LR is a horrible solution for matches that can't be played, as what it does is giving a groundless benefit to people that don't need it. It only "make rich people richer and poor people poorer" to say it one way, exactly the opposite of what's fair.
Think about it, is it fair to get people out of the tournaments only because, it seems, they would bother you with their connections?.
I don't, a match should always be decided on court.
RL is a different story, as it's based on an objective factor (the country you live in is not, it's actually completely arbitrary) which is Ranking and it also gives some space for "surprises" which could always happen.

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 02:31
by SPC
Igor Josifoski wrote:
We should lose our matches because of someone that doesn't deserve to play on the tour? That's their fault that they live in South America, not mine or dasp's ;)

What a terrible comment to make. :annoyed: The only persons UNderserving to play on the tour are the ones who insult people around, not because some connections between 2 people are not going well. In fact with that rule anyone (living in the right region) could cheat on make a bad connection and then take LR for the win, as cheap as that, yeah very derserved win..

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 03:45
by Marcos Nion
Igor Josifoski wrote:We should lose our matches because of someone that doesn't deserve to play on the tour? That's their fault that they live in South America, not mine or dasp's ;)

I think you're exaggerating a little Igor, c'mon man, It's not like the place we live (in this case South America), or our connections are a way to cheat on Tennis Elbow... :wink: :wink: ... Actually, I could say it is, but we also hate Lag, so there is no way that me (or Algo, or Vika V.A) could use it as a cheat... :wink: ... About LR, I also hate this decision, I prefer to play, or, in the most difficult cases, decide the Matches by RL... Think about it... :yes: :yes: :jap: :jap:

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 08:45
by adner
Igor Josifoski wrote:We should lose our matches because of someone that doesn't deserve to play on the tour? That's their fault that they live in South America, not mine or dasp's ;)


Someone with your mindset could say that players from Africa don't deserve that either.

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 12:46
by Dasp
Algo wrote:LR is a horrible solution for matches that can't be played, as what it does is giving a groundless benefit to people that don't need it. It only "make rich people richer and poor people poorer" to say it one way, exactly the opposite of what's fair.
Think about it, is it fair to get people out of the tournaments only because, it seems, they would bother you with their connections?.
I don't, a match should always be decided on court.
RL is a different story, as it's based on an objective factor (the country you live in is not, it's actually completely arbitrary) which is Ranking and it also gives some space for "surprises" which could always happen.

Altough i believe it's not fair the LG since no one has fault where they live i don't also think it's fair for him to win by RL because he was the one with bad conditions and saying it was impossible to play, so he is the one creating lag and benefiting with it..I'm only saying this since i have been playing great this last weeks and i think i could have gone far in this tournament but anyways i won´t go for Lag Rule.. GL against zeka :roll:

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 18:31
by Oussama Hassad
Reserve R2
Oussama Hassad def.Amaz Ouz: 6-1 6-1

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 19:13
by MarcaTennis
Reserve R2 : Hassad defeat me 6-1 6-1
Good match for you and me too because i never played like this ':D Méme si le score 6/1 6/1

Re: Cincinnati Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 15 Aug 2012, 20:01
by MarcaTennis
Who told to do RL ?
Maybe we will play next hours :shock: