Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 02 Jul 2011, 20:19i dont care :p everything is toooooooooooooooooooooooo fine just the host :p
Edit: nevermind.
lol
I prefer a single delay for consistent play.
Mana Games
Tennis Elbow Games & Dungeon Crawler game
https://www.managames.com/Forum/
For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Page 3 of 3
Posted: 02 Jul 2011, 20:19Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 13 Jul 2011, 21:39Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 14 Jul 2011, 04:03I want to add I wouldn't want 117 I don't like the way people return with that, standing in the middle or in the side. Also the rallies are kind of waiting on one side and running to the other, similar to returning. It feels really unrealistic. Also actually the rallies are one of the longest with 117 I feel which is kinda boring. I'd like a minimum delay some else than 117 which is just silly because of the waiting on one side
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 14 Jul 2011, 04:42Btw where is the option to remove auto delay from the game?? lol I want that the most
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 14 Jul 2011, 06:28What is the rule now...I'm a bit confused. Because I would like to play tournaments again but I will not play 117 ping(unless it cant be lower) so if I don't want that ping what will happen? I have to give a walkover? lol
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 15 Jul 2011, 10:58S.Williamz wrote:What is the rule now...I'm a bit confused. Because I would like to play tournaments again but I will not play 117 ping(unless it cant be lower) so if I don't want that ping what will happen? I have to give a walkover? lol
The rule says : Minimum Delay: 117ms.
And it has been taken since january
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 31 Oct 2011, 18:41for me, its impossible to aim with 117ms, the balls goes wide out all the time 
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 31 Oct 2011, 18:56The Potro wrote:for me, its impossible to aim with 117ms, the balls goes wide out all the time
Translation: I'm not very good at this game
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 01 Nov 2011, 18:00Stajus wrote:[Translation: I'm not very good at this game
really? why do i have 1900 elo? + playing without preview?
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 02 Nov 2011, 18:54ELO is nothing? Top 10 can all have 2700 ELO and? 
Doesn't change the fact....that...you have a long way to go 
Lol, stop making these lame preview excuses, it's your choice....I can play a set without it (to adapt) and the next I would beat you easily
Weak excuse. Negged. Thank you 
Doesn't change the fact....that...you have a long way to go Lol, stop making these lame preview excuses, it's your choice....I can play a set without it (to adapt) and the next I would beat you easily
Weak excuse. Negged. Thank you Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 29 Nov 2011, 15:16Stajus wrote:ELO is nothing? Top 10 can all have 2700 ELO and?
Lol, stop making these lame preview excuses, it's your choice....I can play a set without it (to adapt) and the next I would beat you easily
some even reach 3900 elo points xd
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 29 Nov 2011, 15:38I remember Vikky, he had around 4500 i think, but that was long time before xD
Re: For or Against 117ms minimum Delay Rule ?
Posted: 02 Jan 2012, 13:41Delay doesn't have so much influence on the gameplay anymore, case closed... 