Alternative for RL?

Archived Results from the Tour 2010

do u think this(best of tiebreaks) is good alternative to RL(random luck)?

yes,for ping 250-400ms
8
25%
yes,for ping greater than 250ms
8
25%
no,not good if ping is more than 400ms
1
3%
no,it is not good for any laggy match
4
13%
no,RL shud be continued and there shud be proof
4
13%
no,RL shud be continued and no proof(just to believe mods)
7
22%
 
Total votes : 32

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Jelena Jankovic » 07 Nov 2009, 21:03

Togtdyalttai wrote:We give proof whenever someone wants it.


But you can do several rl's and show which you want... That is stupid... I don't know why you did kz's rl for 5 hours... Because for rl you need less than one minute... :annoyed:
Ranking: #2

Titles: 12

2011 Highlights:
W: Auckland, Barcelona, Wimb, Washington
F: AO, Memphis, Dubai, Miami, Belgrade, Bangkok, Moscow, Vienna, Basel, WTF
User avatar
Jelena Jankovic
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 986
Gaming Since: 23 Jun 2009, 16:55
Location: Serbia

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 08 Nov 2009, 08:07

hm yeah it's good to have RL at lag above 400ms and show a proof for it..but how do u give a proof.. i mean through webcam,it shud be live proof lol.then itself we can say its say correct proof to believe for RL result :roll:
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Togtdyalttai » 08 Nov 2009, 08:15

Tennischampion wrote:hm yeah it's good to have RL at lag above 400ms and show a proof for it..but how do u give a proof.. i mean through webcam,it shud be live proof lol.then itself we can say its say correct proof to believe for RL result :roll:


That's way too much for you to expect from us mods for every RL. First, we don't all have webcams. We also would have to wait for both opponents to be on to do every RL. You'll just have to trust a copied result (or a screenshot, if you ask for it) as proof.
#1
2010 Singles: 66-10 (no wo (4))
2010 Doubles: 21-11
2009 Singles: 105-14 (no WO (6))
2009 Doubles: 11-8
Best Results:
'10: W: AO, Miami, Casa, Barca, Rome, Stuttgart, Hamburg, Cincy
'09: W: 13 including Rome, Madrid, RG, Wimby, Cincy, USO
User avatar
Togtdyalttai
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 1693
Gaming Since: 05 Sep 2008, 00:06
Location: USA

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Jelena Jankovic » 08 Nov 2009, 13:35

Togtdyalttai wrote:That's way too much for you to expect from us mods for every RL. First, we don't all have webcams. We also would have to wait for both opponents to be on to do every RL. You'll just have to trust a copied result (or a screenshot, if you ask for it) as proof.


Well I can't always trust in fairness of mods for RL...
Ranking: #2

Titles: 12

2011 Highlights:
W: Auckland, Barcelona, Wimb, Washington
F: AO, Memphis, Dubai, Miami, Belgrade, Bangkok, Moscow, Vienna, Basel, WTF
User avatar
Jelena Jankovic
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 986
Gaming Since: 23 Jun 2009, 16:55
Location: Serbia

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 08 Nov 2009, 17:04

tie breaks can decide the winner in few minutes.so its more fair that the result goes to fair player and more good players rather than for seeds(which is occur in RL,which is really a joke or unfair totally)
by doing RL,a new player can never reach top20 even if he is better than top seeds(i m talking about laggy matches)
So seriously it looks like almost 90%players(except seeds) dont like RL at all.so please find an another alternative for it...tog ,i may believe as mod giving correct proof,but i dont believe other mods becos i dont know much about them...and some guys may not believe mods always as jelena jankovic said.and thats true.so simply find an alternative.
Manutoo, u can ask the mods to change the rule of RL to alternative(like tie-breaks).and this alternative is supported by many players.so as game ADMIN,u can do us this favour :yes:
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Jelena Jankovic » 08 Nov 2009, 17:26

Tennischampion wrote:tie breaks can decide the winner in few minutes.so its more fair that the result goes to fair player and more good players rather than for seeds(which is occur in RL,which is really a joke or unfair totally)
by doing RL,a new player can never reach top20 even if he is better than top seeds(i m talking about laggy matches)
So seriously it looks like almost 90%players(except seeds) dont like RL at all.so please find an another alternative for it...tog ,i may believe as mod giving correct proof,but i dont believe other mods becos i dont know much about them...and some guys may not believe mods always as jelena jankovic said.and thats true.so simply find an alternative.
Manutoo, u can ask the mods to change the rule of RL to alternative(like tie-breaks).and this alternative is supported by many players.so as game ADMIN,u can do us this favour :yes:


Well I can't agree for tie-breaks too... Because sometimes better players can't play with lag... That is very hard especially for attackers... Maybe they can beat their opponents easily without the lag...
Ranking: #2

Titles: 12

2011 Highlights:
W: Auckland, Barcelona, Wimb, Washington
F: AO, Memphis, Dubai, Miami, Belgrade, Bangkok, Moscow, Vienna, Basel, WTF
User avatar
Jelena Jankovic
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 986
Gaming Since: 23 Jun 2009, 16:55
Location: Serbia

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Togtdyalttai » 08 Nov 2009, 19:40

FYI Teja, 75% of the time RL is done because people aren't here at the same time, not because there was lag.
#1
2010 Singles: 66-10 (no wo (4))
2010 Doubles: 21-11
2009 Singles: 105-14 (no WO (6))
2009 Doubles: 11-8
Best Results:
'10: W: AO, Miami, Casa, Barca, Rome, Stuttgart, Hamburg, Cincy
'09: W: 13 including Rome, Madrid, RG, Wimby, Cincy, USO
User avatar
Togtdyalttai
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 1693
Gaming Since: 05 Sep 2008, 00:06
Location: USA

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby tati cornet » 08 Nov 2009, 21:08

tog is right, this chat is ridiculous. i have played the whole season (except from after wimbly until montreal) and i never had to ask a rl. in singles and doubles! so even when i had to play a south american or an indian, i found a way to do it and to finish the match (except against tennis champion in hamburg but...no comment :o).
so i think every player has to "move his ass" without connecting himself for only 10 mn per day.
and furthermore, players who have always huge problems with lag can't complain to lose by rl. if their connexion is bad, they can't hope to reach the top 20 as some want to. have a better connexion or stop playing.
tati cornet
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 1143
Gaming Since: 11 Aug 2008, 00:27
Location: france

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Santiago92 » 08 Nov 2009, 21:14

I had a problem with RL in US Open. Weeka32 didn't want to play cause ping was 450 ms, but it was totally playable. So that's not justice to do RL...
User avatar
Santiago92
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 867
Gaming Since: 23 Jan 2008, 18:42
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 09 Nov 2009, 08:34

JelenaJankovic wrote:Well I can't agree for tie-breaks too... Because sometimes better players can't play with lag... That is very hard especially for attackers... Maybe they can beat their opponents easily without the lag...

ok ok i m not saying only use tie breaks.i want someone to give an alternative to RL(ofcourse tie breaks are supported by many) but if ur idea is better than tie breaks,we surely invite u to discuss that idea with us(be bold to give ur ideas becos no one wud comment u for ur idea)
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 09 Nov 2009, 08:43

Togtdyalttai wrote:FYI Teja, 75% of the time RL is done because people aren't here at the same time, not because there was lag.

ok then do RL or give w/o but what about laggy matches.when both players are there in right time to play,lag is that creates RL :roll: so have a convincing idea to remove RL.ofcoure i find atleast 2 to 3 RLs in almost every draw which just simply shows that some guys can never top the rankings in any way :sweat:
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 09 Nov 2009, 09:05

tati cornet wrote:tog is right, this chat is ridiculous. i have played the whole season (except from after wimbly until montreal) and i never had to ask a rl. in singles and doubles! so even when i had to play a south american or an indian, i found a way to do it and to finish the match (except against tennis champion in hamburg but...no comment :o).
so i think every player has to "move his ass" without connecting himself for only 10 mn per day.
and furthermore, players who have always huge problems with lag can't complain to lose by rl. if their connexion is bad, they can't hope to reach the top 20 as some want to. have a better connexion or stop playing.

awwwwwwww u r awful guy.u know that i lost in RL that day(forget that damn day with u),it's becos u r a seeded guy.but don't forget the next match we played in new haven,i won it without RL.so thats it.it's just kinda small proof to show low ranked players can beat seeds,so why do RL and disappoint them.and man u r just ridiculous.no one will be born with bad connection ,its just the distance b/w countries and the net those countries have.game is designed for everyone to have fun and not to stop playing if there is bad connection.we have good connection with countries near to us,so its just a global problem.so just shut up :|
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 09 Nov 2009, 09:08

Santiago92 wrote:I had a problem with RL in US Open. Weeka32 didn't want to play cause ping was 450 ms, but it was totally playable. So that's not justice to do RL...

yeah tell me if u have any ideas to give alternative to RL 8-)
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Tennischampion » 09 Jan 2010, 01:26

i lost once again in RL.this time i m very strong.but i just cudn't win.this time with lower ranked player than me lol :lol:
why don't mods please change the rule of RL to this best 3 tie breaks method :annoyed: manutoo please support and tell to mods for a change :roll:
User avatar
Tennischampion
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 762
Gaming Since: 31 Jul 2009, 23:43

Re: Alternative for RL?

Postby Togtdyalttai » 09 Jan 2010, 03:20

Tennischampion wrote:i lost once again in RL.this time i m very strong.but i just cudn't win.this time with lower ranked player than me lol :lol:
why don't mods please change the rule of RL to this best 3 tie breaks method :annoyed: manutoo please support and tell to mods for a change :roll:


We discussed this, and decided that our new system of RL would be better.
#1
2010 Singles: 66-10 (no wo (4))
2010 Doubles: 21-11
2009 Singles: 105-14 (no WO (6))
2009 Doubles: 11-8
Best Results:
'10: W: AO, Miami, Casa, Barca, Rome, Stuttgart, Hamburg, Cincy
'09: W: 13 including Rome, Madrid, RG, Wimby, Cincy, USO
User avatar
Togtdyalttai
crazy of the little yellow ball
crazy of the little yellow ball
 
Messages: 1693
Gaming Since: 05 Sep 2008, 00:06
Location: USA

PreviousNext

Return to Tour 2010

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest