Page 6 of 17

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 18:57
by Max Botti
Max Botti def. Ro.Federer 6-4 6-4

Thank you ! u are great player. im very happy for victory :D

Good match !

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 19:12
by Togtdyalttai
Togtdyalttai(1) def. B.Z. 6-0 6-0

Lag came early in the 2nd set so we had to start that set over using Hamachi but then it worked fine.

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 20:18
by RS1
Tog defeats RS 6-1 6-2.

Oh well he's just too good. I make so many errors that i don't make against other people. :roll: I don't understand how this things happen, my second serve disappeared in some moments. Congrats

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 21:01
by Lucky Rooky
To Qualifier-6

Please contact me after u r ready to play in 1st round

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 21:38
by marian_v
marian_v wrote:Hi Hakanomoku (13)!
You are my opponent in R1! I can play today at 21.30 my time ( after 2 h). I'm waiting you.....


my oponent didn't appear!!! :(

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 21:51
by jeremy
Jeremy def Nikki Minaj 6-0 ret.

Good rallies, and Nikki is a great person and sport. Just the timing of the game just wasn't right, but the ping was excellent, I don't recall any lag.

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 22:36
by RS1
Ok so after all those reserve matches, the first quali round:
RS Beats Fernando Gonzalez 6-1 6-0.

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 22:45
by Voja
Vojatenis def. Max Botti 6-4 4-6 7-6 (4)
wow wow and wow
what a match! we would play better if there wanst any lag ... but anyway it was a good match and im happy to win it
first set i won hardly and it was on 5 4 on my serve 15 30 but i served 2 aces and i think he did an erorr then
second set he won hardly (like every set) and i had chances but i didnt use them
and the third set was wheird it started with a break for me and he rebeak me momently so then everything was opend in third set
we went to tie break and it was wheird too it started with 2 0 for me but then he got back and i was leading all the time in tie break
and it was finished with 7 4 for me .... i didnt have my first serve and i played too avrage and he played well...i think he had adv.
becouse of lag .. i didnt used to it and i think he did
in the end the points where 101 99 for me
it was a good match after all 8-) and GL in future torunaments ! im sure u are gonna be great on every torunament with this game
bye

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 23:05
by Jelena Jankovic
Vojatenis wrote:Vojatenis def. Max Botti 6-4 4-6 7-6 (4)
wow wow and wow
what a match! we would play better if there wanst any lag ... but anyway it was a good match and im happy to win it
first set i won hardly and it was on 5 4 on my serve 15 30 but i served 2 aces and i think he did an erorr then
second set he won hardly (like every set) and i had chances but i didnt use them
and the third set was wheird it started with a break for me and he rebeak me momently so then everything was opend in third set
we went to tie break and it was wheird too it started with 2 0 for me but then he got back and i was leading all the time in tie break
and it was finished with 7 4 for me .... i didnt have my first serve and i played too avrage and he played well...i think he had adv.
becouse of lag .. i didnt used to it and i think he did
in the end the points where 101 99 for me
it was a good match after all 8-) and GL in future torunaments ! im sure u are gonna be great on every torunament with this game
bye

C'monnnnnnnnnnn Voja!!!!!!! I know that you will win this tournament!!! :applause: :applause: :applause: You had a happy end in the tie break... :D Not like me! :)

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 10 Aug 2009, 23:17
by Stefan Edberg
Stefan Edberg def. Marvolo 6-0 6-0
I was a little better in this match. I think he will be alot better in future.
Gl in future tournaments!!

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 11 Aug 2009, 00:06
by X-Ter
Hasan def. JC Ferrero 7-6(4) 6-3

Great match, we both kept serve very well. I broke him in the first game but he broke me as I was serving for the set. In the second set, after I broke him I managed to keep serve till the end.

Good luck in future tourneys!!

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 11 Aug 2009, 00:55
by Fedex
.

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 11 Aug 2009, 00:56
by Santiago92
Santiago92 def Sybylle Bammer 6-4

Stupid people again... first I asked him whether he can wait 10 min to play, till 18.40 hs in Argentina and if we can agree to play 1 set if the lag is high... no problem, we agreed that.

Ok, we started playing and no problem... 5-4 for me, he was serving 15-40 (2 set points for me) and then the game has frozen... ok, after a lot of discussions I first remembered him that we agreed to play 1 set, but he said that if it was unplayable... ok... I rehost and then the lag was unplayable, so we agreed to play 1 set in that case... he served till 15-40, he won a point and then it was game, set and match for him... he insulted me... what a stupid.

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 11 Aug 2009, 00:59
by Sybille Bammer
Santiago92 def. Sybille Bammer 6-4

What a unfair player.
What a stupid match.
He had luck all the time.
It was a lag between 350 and 450. even more

He said we agreed one set, but we don't fixed it.
I only said yes, if the lag is unpayable, so i thought we look in the first two games or so, how it's going to play and then we decide. But nothing, he decided on his own. Later i accepted. Because at the set point for him it broke down. it was a lag at 1600 or so. Maybe he opend a programme or so, because he is that unfair.


Now i can understand krisztian.

Re: Montreal Singles (Official Topic)

PostPosted: 11 Aug 2009, 01:03
by Santiago92
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool.

Don't lie Sybille, I agreed to play 3 sets if the lag was playable, I recognized that I understood wrong what you said and then we have to play 3 sets... but then the lag was unplayable and we have to use that rule that we agreed: 1 set if the lag is unplayable. Maybe YOU open a programm because I only had hamachi.