Page 20 of 105

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 21:03
by invitado
R.Federer(2) def. Hit'em-Hard Kelly (1) 6-1

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 21:15
by Hit'em-Hard Kelly
invitado wrote:R.Federer(2) def. Hit'em-Hard Kelly (1) 6-1

Are you freaking kidding me?!?!?!! :shock: :evil:
You are such a cheater!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :x

First of all, at the beginning I was up, and then I had to answer the phone in the other room. I asked him to wait, but I did not pause it because then he could retire without losing ELO and I was up at the time, serving. I then came back a few minutes later and he was up 5-1! :shock: I have no idea how this happened, since I was serving, and it should have just waited until I returned.

Then, to make this even worse from R. Federer!
I explained to him that I had left (obviously, since i didn't move at all in those last 3 or 4 games), and after a while he promised that we would finish the set but not count it because it was clearly not an actual set. So he agreed and held serve to win the next game, winning the set 6-1.

And then he posts the score! :shock: What a liar!
:x

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 21:22
by Jazzo
Jazzo(6) - Brad(3) 6:4

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 21:38
by Jazzo
Jazzo(6) - Brad(3) 7:6

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 21:50
by Jazzo
Jazzo(6) - Brad(3) 6:2

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 21:57
by invitado R.Federer
always play with Hit'em-Hard Kelly and she said ¨my keyboard is broken¨ when she won is for the leadder and when i won not. i don t understand this system :? :?:

PostPosted: 23 Jun 2007, 22:37
by Williamz
H-H Kelly, when you are serving, if you wait too long without serving the player will serve a weak serve by it self. :lol:

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 00:15
by Hit'em-Hard Kelly
Williamz wrote:H-H Kelly, when you are serving, if you wait too long without serving the player will serve a weak serve by it self. :lol:


Really? Like how long? That would probably explain it :lol: . Thanks.

Still, R. Federer is completely out of line, showing extremely poor class. Do you admit that you said, after being up 5-1 because I wasn't there, the match would not count?

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 04:54
by Guest
this is fishy. why not pause game? everybody knows that the player will serve ball automatically. and who cares about someone elses elo. somethings up...

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 05:43
by Hit'em-Hard Kelly
Anonymous wrote:this is fishy. why not pause game? everybody knows that the player will serve ball automatically. and who cares about someone elses elo. somethings up...


You're right, something is up. It's R. Federer being a complete jerk.
I did not pause the game because yesterday manutoo made an update that makes the ELO not lower/gain if you retire while your opponent is in the menus. Since I was winning, I did not want R. Federer to retire while I was away because then it would not count. I did not know that if I left my player would automatically serve. I've never just sat there watching my player stand ready to serve before, so it's not that weird that I did not know this.

There are the answers to your questions Guest.

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 18:08
by stuey
Stuey (#13) - Brad (#3) 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-6(4)

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 18:26
by Jazzo
Jazzo (6) - Brad (3) 6:3

Beware

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 21:38
by Brad1981
Beware of anyone using the name "Brad" who has LESS THAN 480 games played. :?

PostPosted: 24 Jun 2007, 21:55
by Brad1981
Brad(3) def. R.Federer(2) 6-4

online tennis leader

PostPosted: 26 Jun 2007, 15:01
by P.R.O Nadal
(#5) P.R.O Nadal defeat Pat(10#) :lol: